Posted on

Working the Problem

Through the course of working with the various constituent parties and movements that are broadly considered part of the right, my observation has been they share a strange parallel problem.  Whereas movements on the left first articulate their beliefs and then go about directly seeking how to promote their viewpoint through any means possible, so many groups on the right have a strange aversion to seeking any source of power through which to realize their ideas.

Discourse amongst people on the right usually seeks to identify the highest ideal or the logical necessity of an idea or identity, but then they behave as if presenting the most compelling argument is the end of the process.  The best ideas are assumed to be those most worthy of adoption on the merits, and the right handicaps itself by refusing to employ the same passion and resolve in pushing their conclusions as they do in seeking their exposition.  Put bluntly, the right consistently talks while the left is much more willing to act.

Civilization, for better or worse, is something of a passion play.  People are inspired to follow those who lead, who go so far as to impose their ideas, because they assume if you lack the gumption to push forward what you believe with that same intensity, then your belief is less.  While I realize most people on the right avoid doing this specifically because of legitimate beliefs about the limitations of political power, the value of free will, and respect for individual consent, the problem is such thoughtful in a time of decisive cultural conflict is akin to adopting a purely defensive strategy.

To attempt to win a war through endless retreat is impossible.  You might be able to enact more casualties and have a more cohesive bond, but at some point, a breakout becomes necessary.  The right has reached a point where thanks to cultural oppression, decades of indoctrination, and impending demographic transformation, that we must find novel ways to fight to force our ideas into larger adoption or we will be subsumed by the very majoritarian laws and impulses which we created for our own protection.  We cannot simply hope anymore to persuade people.

I know this is a bitter pill for many because it was for me.  It runs against our many years of learning, both in a system that encourages submission by thinkers, and by our own higher faculties which recognize the inherent uncertainty of staking claim to absolute truth such as the left does glibly.  Remember, even though Marxism has been demonstrated wrong time and again, with the sad cost of millions dead as evidence and human misery in its wake, it retains amazing currency not because of reason, but because of the misplaced faith it enjoys from so many who want to believe in it, and mobilize their belief in unrestrained pursuit of power to seek their goal.

To my friends on the right, I ask if we pursued power just a bit more honestly, openly, and directly how much better could we achieve our goals?  Can we work the problem of achieving our goals not as a philosophical debate, but instead as united men and women behind the belief our way of thinking is better, and place enough faith in our conclusions being perhaps not perfect, but sufficiently better constructed than those of the left that we would use all the tools at our potential disposal to shift society?  An act of such boldness would inspire many if we have the courage to take this.  Refusal to do so will only demoralize further.

The National Right believes in will and action in pursuit of quality.  While we will not ever perfectly agree on what is right and just, I think we can still clearly flesh out what is wrong and wicked, and we can unite to prevent those who have such thoughts from increasing their influence or power any further.  With such resolve, we will begin reclaiming our lost preeminence and then we can debate amongst ourselves questions of ideals, knowing we will never reach them, but knowing more perfect unions remain to be achieved and that our failures will be incomparably better than the successes of those against whom we now strive.

Be not afraid to assume power.  The world needs us.  America needs us.  Our time is now.

Posted on

How Andrew Jackson solved Donald Trump’s Problem

After having an election stolen from him in 1824, when Andrew Jackson stormed to victory as an outsider in 1828, he faced a very similar problem to what is undermining the efforts of Donald Trump.  A permanent bureaucracy had comfortably settled into place including a revolving door of Congressional appointments to the Cabinet as well as the specter of the Bank of the United States chaired by Nicholas Biddle.  The no-nonsense general went about removing these obstacles to fulfilling his populist promises, and though he had to survive an assassination attempt at point blank range, Old Hickory’s actions parallel perfectly what could help Trump today.

The President of the United States has wide latitude in his authority to conduct the executive functions delineated by the Constitution.  By habit and legal process, we have become accustomed to devolving authority through the Cabinet, but there is no reason the President cannot either directly or through appointed extra-congressional proxy find leadership to whom the bureaucracy can be brought into thrall.  Jackson did precisely the same thing with his famous “kitchen cabinet” where leaders with talent who would not gain Congressional sanction were brought in to provide leadership and guidance.  Trump could do the very same, bringing in outside reformers to drain the swamp, and effectively shut down the government in defense of his policy initiatives, such as the border wall as part of a needed much larger immigration reduction plan, as political sanction for this needed action.

The permanent bureaucracy has come to believe and act as if they represent the true government of the United States.  They do not, they have not, and they must not assume this authority.  If they break Trump, no one will dare challenge their amassed resources and power again, so the time is upon us where the swamp must be drained if peaceful reform is to have any chance of success.  Radical reduction of many of the major bureaucracies is only the first step.

Another step which must follow is to reduce institutions by which the swamp spreads its influence.  Like Jackson, I would argue that targeting the Fed as the single most powerful entity that controls governments through its management of the money supply, is a good place to start.  Return printing of money to the US Treasury and control of money to the people instead of this bank held quasi private corporation.  Other prominent targets should include the CIA, which has clearly ignored its legal prohibition to act upon US soil, and the FBI, whose agents have publicly admitted to wanting to fix election results.  Fire them all, giving control to the military for intelligence and law enforcement functions if needed until such time as a loyal civil service can be restored.

The waiting game benefits neither Trump nor the American people.  They are trying to buy time until they can forge reasons for an impeachment, all in the effort to undermine our entire system of government so that these unelected officials can maintain their privilege and power.  The people see this threat, and after two years of lies bolstered by media deceit, are ready to support our President in acting to remove the parasites from our republic who think themselves our betters.

I only pray Trump has not just the courage, but also the wisdom to act with the intensity and speed required before he dies the death of a thousand paper cuts which these swamp dwellers and those who bankroll them clearly intend.

Posted on

Manufactured Consent and the Myth of Leftist Support

Without any doubt, the left enjoys overwhelming cultural dominance.  Their commanding position in academia, media, and the nonprofit sectors attached to culture is unmatched, but from such heights, I’ve noticed many of their adherents push the false belief their culture is universally popular.  As the most recent election revealed, their reach may be wide but it is hardly deep, and I want to talk about this net in which we are ensnared.

At this point in time, the cultural dominance of the left is no longer an organic development of popular expression as it might have been some decades ago, but rather a deliberately manufactured web of connections between institutions designed to force compliance from society through a series of escalating penalties and retributions.  Censorship is now encouraged across emergent platforms to conform with the lines repeated across legacy media, all in service of Marxist ideals which are promoted at any cost and whose opposition must always be suppressed.

The silent majority holds traditional American values.  Belief in the nuclear family, a desire for personal responsibility, morality that is not just subjective, and that all people have intrinsic worth of all identities – including the white majority.  They have been visually assaulted for decades now with ideas designed to confuse, conflating genders in some mad science experiment, attacking virtue and value, and laying the groundwork for the suppression of the majority in advance of a future takedown to unmake America’s culture.  For this to occur, all that is required is our silence for a long enough time for those willing to do anything to take power to succeed.  And, despite the respite Trump is providing – with the potential for a true reversal still in play – they remain close so long as they use their cultural weapons to dictate terms as we see them do through the fake news and crazy ideas.

People would speak out, but they do not want to fight in the realm of ideas.  There is a reason sites no longer carry comments, and those who speak against insanity are either marginalized or banned from the most popular social media platforms.  Big Tech has been a terrible sellout, but predictably so, as the model being pioneered to serve the biggest market, China, is based on a Marxist ideology of information control.  For those who follow the line, social media status – financial comfort and psychological gratification await.  But speak out, and you become a pariah.

Groups like the SPLC and ADL serve as gatekeepers, organizations funded by foreign governments for the subversion of the United States, and who utilize their resources and networking to destroy legitimate dissenting voices who question this agenda.  They use slurs and slanders, the same attacks by which they defame their opponents in an Alinskyite juxtaposition, to compel still people on the right into perpetual division with one another using fear words like racism and worse.  As you will have already noted, their operational definition of racism is a person of a non-approved identity or belief who wants to live freely and assert their own beliefs publicly.  Such nonconformity is not to be permitted, and it is only through these means of public defamation, leading to loss of status and often employment, that these perverse ideas being grafted onto our society can hang on.

We must cast ourselves free of them, and we will begin to win back the ability to have a true cultural fight when we refuse to allow the left to castigate our thinkers on the right who express controversial ideas.  Political correctness is un-American, but more importantly, completely destructive to anything other than a security state where everyone must live a perpetual lie.  Marxists are not bothered by this as they base their whole ideology on the most destructive of lies:  That equal outcomes are the natural result of society.  They never have been, and never can be unless you destroy people as thinking individuals and turn them into machines.  They try.

This is why we take an unequivocal stand in support of free speech.  Free speech is free thought, and without the challenge of ideas, we cannot make the distinctions between good and bad, useful and harmful, and health and wellness.  We believe in quality, and we believe strongly that America believes enough in itself to get past this terrible trap of guilt and intimidation, believing in time the full wickedness of their dehumanizing agenda on the left will become evident and people will be held to account.

Until then, we’re stuck living in the insurgency.  I always tell people keep the ideas alive, and talk to your neighbors, friends, and families away from the prying eyes of those who think they have the authority to force your compliance.  They do not.

Posted on

The Coming Civil War

After months of effort, I’m proud to announce The Coming Civil War is now complete and available for purchase.

This was a difficult book to write because facts forced me to draw hard conclusions.  While peace is something for which we should always strive, America is divided in so many different ways with so little good will and commonality between the divisions themselves as well as those on different sides of these conflicts, that outcomes which will not be extremely painful in the short to medium term seem unlikely.

As preview, this book talks about four main divisions tearing our nation asunder:  Ideology (left vs. right), residency (where one lives – town or country), race, and culture.  The nature of these divisions is should any one of these conflicts come to a boiling point where events and irreconcilable differences bring the cold cultural fight to some hot action, it is highly probable every other issue will come into play at precisely the same time.  With a lack of common purpose and agreement between partisans, the center cannot hold.

In admitting such, I do not posit moral equivalency of the sides.  What we could call broadly the left coalition exists to realize radical egalitarianism, struggling against nature itself to equalize outcomes from disparate peoples and ideas, and being willing to use any coercive power to accomplish these ends.  Population displacement, forced censorship, and cultural indoctrination are only the beginning of what they will utilize in their already doomed effort to prove this iteration of the Marxist plot will finally be different.

The right has come lately to this battle, with the last gasp nationalist efforts that sent Trump into office finally recognizing that a cultural retreat across sixty years has done nothing but seen the destruction of the family in many places as well as the induction of the one free civil society that encouraged virtue into the every growing state.  Those targeted for destruction as traditional power centers:  Whites, Christians, men, traditionalists, and those who believe in liberty are being pushed together by mutual threat.  Can we organize?  We’re trying.

Let us not forget the status quo who made up both sides, the wealthy people who sold out America for a comfortable existence, allowing our culture to erode for years, bringing anyone and everyone into this nation.  The left loved the votes.  The right loved the cheap labor.  Neither loved our nation, and even now, our elites still think so globally, imagining the enclaves they’ve produced for themselves represent the reality Americans faced for many years of a country in decline due to neglect and abuse.

The book covers who the players are, what institutions they control, and how they work to protect their prerogatives.  All the relevant angles are covered, and they lead to an inescapable conclusion that one side must take dominance and lead this ship or we will crash upon the rocks with only shattered pieces to remain.

I lay out six scenarios for the future.  None are easy, but if you want to learn more about these as a means to consider what this asks of your family or yourself, consider getting this book.  It will change how you think, give you the facts and information to honestly face hard choices ahead, and might just motivate you to get active now during what will soon be seen strangely enough as the good old days.

It is a hard book, but an honest book.  The word s are easy enough to read and the story is very clearly developed, but it is a gut punch to realize the future will likely be brutal.  That said, better you be ready now, and my book is one you should read.

For those wanting to purchase a copy, there are several options.  My preferred option is to sell directly and you can send an inquiry to for purchasing.  Payment can be made by check, money order, cryptocurrency, or electronic payment options upon request.  The list price is $25 plus $5 for shipping and handling for paperbacks and $10 for digital copy, and I will gladly sign all copies sent out.  Should anyone be looking to buy multiple copies for distribution, bulk rates may be arranged in that instance. is another option where both the print and electronic versions are available.  Should you purchase there, feedback is most welcome and appreciated, and please let others know what you think of the book.  Spread the word, because it is an important message, and also because it allows me to keep writing.  Please know that I am grateful for your support and patronage.

Lastly, I want to offer a huge thank you to my friend John Young of European Americans United for his editorial efforts.  As interesting as my ideas can be, I know my grammar is not always perfect, and his many corrections in both style and substance are as much part of this book as my own writing.

If anyone wants to simply send a check/money order directly for a book, please send $30 to: PO Box 583, Jackman, ME 04945.

Posted on

Our Goals for the Near Future

Thinking about the National Right as an organization isn’t quite the right model.  We are neither a political party or an advocacy group, though we sometimes engage in these activities.  What we really are is the embodiment of an idea whose time has come:  A United Right in America which is cognizant of demographic realities and acts upon these patterns.  It is far harder to kill an idea than it is to take down an institution, so this site exists to spread strength, courage, and insight to other groups, and my own humble efforts are designed to get people on the Right to recognize the larger enemy that confronts us all:  People who would remake America in a very different image than the Founders intended and that generations of our ancestors strove to create.

What unites the Right is principled defense against the radicalized Left, and what we must all recognize now is should the Left return to Federal power, they will almost certainly act to destroy all those from the most milquetoast conservative to the radical authoritarian as threats to their plans.  We have seen firsthand how they relish censorship in their sphere of cultural control, and how they have defamed reputations and taken away the ability for many to economically sustain itself.  We know when they last ran DC, they used the IRS to punish the Tea Party, the Department of Justice to fund Black Lives Matter, and opened the flood gates to the Third World not just in America, but across the entirety of the West with devastating consequences from which certain ancient nations like Germany, Sweden, and others may never recover.  We look to South Africa, where the communist radicalized minorities are in full ascent, and see brutal murders, the theft of land, and the ideological depersoning of whiteness – of tradition – a perversion of history.  Obama just celebrated this.  We must oppose it.

No more Democrats can be elected President.  We must work tirelessly to ensure only Republicans win the highest office, and further still to ensure nationalists who are committed to retaking America and to not just conserving, but also building upward this country by going places which historically have been uncomfortable for the Right.  We need to talk about culture, about values that are timeless rather than transactional, and to hold our people to account to live by a common standard – not where certain groups get a perpetual free pass.  The Left has long attacked us as their enemies, and we will need the same ardor if we are to win – if we are to survive.

It goes without saying there are many Republicans who do not share these interests.  As possible, they must be enlightened or replaced.  The party must embrace its responsibility to care for the nation, for the worker as well as the employer, and for families and dignity across all groups.  Liberty only has value when coupled with responsible action, moral thought, and clearly identifying those who share these values and working for mutual benefit.  We are a family – the last scions of a civilization in trouble – who must fix what generations of deceit, idleness, and greed broke.

We must do this by any means possible.  I encourage a political solution, which includes tough policy choices on immigration, family planning, culture, and foreign policy.  But we must be realistic also:  The risk our nation is finally and fully stolen from us by the combination of violent activists, corrupt politicians, a hostile deep state, and propagandizing media is high.  Higher still if they think they can get away with this, and we must begin to make clear in our millions of different voices that we will resist them, we will fight them, and we will defeat them.  It might be nice, but it more likely will be dirty, and this insurgency of popular will against totalitarian idealism is what the National Right garners.

Such a fight would be devastating and we should have no illusions about this as we seek for other options.  But worse still would be the final surrender of our sovereignty and values, to go quietly into the night when we inherited a nation built by brave revolutionaries who stood up, fought, bled, and died for freedom.  Their freedom was to realize a life with meaning, where worship was protected, where families were valued, and where anything was possible.  That is the freedom we need to regain.

I write this piece today for new people wondering what the National Right is about.  It’s about winning our country back, stopping these communists who have been lurking in the shadows for at least a century, and telling them it is time we shut them back in the dingy closets from which they emerged with their filth and lies.  It’s about making sure Trump isn’t a one hit wonder, but rather the beginning of a new path, and to ask this question of what next with optimism, vision, and numbers.  We know we don’t own the culture now, and I, like many others, have paid the price of my career for the right to ask this next inquiry.  What must we do to make America ours once more?

In that quest, we welcome those who share our values, understand there will be disagreements, and believe these can be overcome by reason and good humor.  Our differences pale compared to what is planned for all of us who have been marked as enemies of the would be state.  Let us remember that, and should you agree with my words, let people know about the National Right.

This website is one hub.  The podcast Conversations with Tom is another.  There is a group on Facebook, on Gab, and we affiliate with others to build courage, networking, and confidence.  Whether you support that, or simply organize your friends and then family, please do what you can, because a time is coming when money will fail you and big words will only be memories:  What will matter are the people around you, whom you can trust, and what you can do together.  Nature always reasserts itself and our hour draws near.

I have faith in our people and in our cause.  A better tomorrow awaits if we are willing to stand up to protect it.

It’s worth remembering the mightiest of towering trees in the forest all began from a single healthy seed, acorn, or nut.  Plant a seed and see what rises…that’s what we are doing here today.

Posted on

The Media’s Favorite Lie: Guilt By Association

Even though my home internet is not working today, I came into town just to post this article because good friends of mine are telling me how I am being slandered with things I have not said.  I am being called a Nazi because I agree with the most vocal voices speaking out against this effort to transform New England from a predominantly white region to a diverse one.

Leave aside for the moment that no one dares ask the people up here what they want.  The press has decided, as they often do, to unilaterally push their communist agenda of population replacement out of fear that the majority is waking up and seeing what happens when we lose power.  Take South Africa as the extreme example where land seizure without compensation is the now the law of the land, and see we are being cajoled onto this same pathway.

People often ask why there is no resistance, but they miss the many opportunities to resist where the media paints those who dare to speak out as whatever pejorative works best:  Nazi, racist, bigot, etc.  It doesn’t matter what the accused says because they aren’t given equal voice, and more often than not, what happens is the media uses an ad hominem attack to slander good people.  We see this most clearly from Antifa, who consider every Republican a Nazi in waiting, yet the media still uses their slander to some effect to reach people who don’t know better.

For the record, I am not a national socialist nor have I ever claimed to be one.  However, I will freely admit I talk to people who call themselves such, because the media has zero right to tell me to whom I can and cannot speak, and I have said often and publicly I will speak with anyone who engages publicly, respectfully, and honestly.  I frequently speak to people whose views are well right of my own, not in endorsement of their belief, but because I believe in free speech and engagement.

I work with people from time to time whom I do not agree with on all issues.  Sometimes, I work with people on one issue where we disagree on most issues.  That is the nature of all politics, but the media plays a rather dirty trick where only those of us on the right are ever slandered by affiliation.  You will never hear them once ask a Democrat to denounce Antifa or a communist because the media exists to help the left realize unity and to hurt the right through division.

Ask me who my enemies are and I will tell you quite openly and freely they are those forces of the left that seek to destroy our liberties, replace our population, silence our voices, and defame our good reputations.  People who know me will defend the person I am:  Thoughtful, considerate, and brave, with no animus against anyone for facts about which they have no choice.  But I, and the National Right besides me, are fearless in speaking about terrible ideas like Islam, population replacement, and socialism.

They attack me periodically because they fear what the National Right is doing.  We are organizing the counter forces to stand against any leftist plot to use violence against our nation.  We are uniting the moral forces of the right under one banner, working past our real differences, and speaking against their agenda.  They hate us for it.  They hate me more than most, and having taken my job, they hope to silence my voice by calling me a dirty name.

It’s going to take a hell of a lot more than name calling to shut this cranky bastard up, and I hope you will stand with me again as this next wave of attacks come against me.  Help by sharing this article and awareness of the National Right.  Next week, when the book comes out, get a copy or more of The Coming Civil War and read what they don’t want you to know.

Most of all, never let them decide who you can speak with and never accept how they define you.  The leftists who own the media declared I was doomed to corruption before I was even born by virtue of being white, so if you want to look who truly promotes the genocidal ideology of hate and falsehood, look for that sickle and the trail of bodies that follows.  If you can’t find it directly, my hint to you is to follow the socialists and listen to the friends to whom they speak.

Posted on

Why Economics Loses Politically

By any reasonable standard, the Trump Administration specifically and the Republicans in general should be far more popular than they are.  America is enjoying the greatest economic prosperity this millennium after many years of struggling.  Not only is the GDP rising, but unemployment is at historic lows across all groups and real wages are rising for the first time in many decades.  Thanks to a combination of tax and regulatory reforms, Americans can work more and keep more.  So, what gives?

Public polls consistently show more Americans disapprove of the job Trump is doing even though they ironically also show optimism rising.  Part of this phenomenon can be explained away by the misleading nature of political polling where the sample selection, buried in small print, often oversamples self-identified Democrats.  But, for this reliable media lie, and do remember the polling outfits are paid by the media to provide the right information, there’s a larger trend here which better explains why more people don’t support Trump based on economic success:  Psychology.

People have a funny quirk in how they attribute outcomes.  We take pride in our accomplishments, but we look to blame others for our failures.  Were the economy a wreck, the media would absolutely blame Trump each day for the misery of the people and even most Republicans would accept this somewhat.  But we see success as being mostly of our own making, which is true to some extent because it does require far more personal effort to make things happen, but it’s just as true a friendly environment for economic growth matters immensely.  For clear evidence, consider how much harder it was to operate or start a business under Obama.  But people overlook their own tendency to own success without sharing their laurels, and the Republicans have put themselves in a position where they are counting on people not to do this.

The problem is Obama, like all Democrats, has a friend in the media who will carry water for him no matter what he did.  Even though the Democrat economy was worse by every objective metric, their cultural control has always been better, and this allows them to shape even an absurd message into propaganda.  They had to overcome the Bush years, and now they take credit for what Trump accomplished, even though it was clearly by overturning all Obama did.  But so long as only their one message is heard, and as well as they prey on weaknesses, fears, envy, and resentment, the left will be playing to a psychologically stronger position.

In the broader picture, this is one reason the left shifted from economic Marxism to cultural Marxism.  Economics requires numbers, but culture only requires impulses, and it is far easier to stoke feelings than create verifiable growth.  The left finds those least capable in society, importing more whenever possible, and then activate them politically by starting with this flawed notion equal outcomes are a natural expectation, then blaming corruption for why these are not realized.  Envy, anger, and covetousness are cultivated in those who refuse to believe their own inadequacies can have any role in their failures, and these groups are all gathered to resist.  As long as they don’t actually have power, such actions are stable, because the blame works in good times and in bad.

Bad times sell themselves where people’s suffering is enough to naturally activate the envy of people not just in the targeted groups, but across different social barriers.  But the interesting thing is times of opportunity, where the most resourceful succeed most fully, create a situation where even though wealth rises across the board, the disparity between the most and least successful also grows more quickly, allowing envy against the rich to be shouted to those on the left who imagine they should have what the wealthiest and hardest working enjoy.  So, they get more pissed off.

Not only that, but an affluent society is one where political revolution becomes more possible.  As totalitarians throughout the world have proven, a country where people are struggling just to feed themselves rarely has the energy to contemplate revolution, the continual and perpetual goal of the Marxist.  But you know who can think on these things:  College kids who have nothing but time to waste and false idealism.  Activists who get paid from unknown sources to demonstrate in the streets.  White people who’ve been indoctrinated to such self-hatred they believe their own destruction is some perverse form of justice.  These people see a moment of wealth as an opportunity, and we see in their consolidation of media control, at least the potential for a larger and far more troubling revolution than most Americans can imagine.

Republicans think because they won an election and gave people more money that they’re winning.  It was a political victory of sorts, but without taking out the cultural structures that drive resentment as a daily drum beat to millions of Americans, all these good works may only serve to facilitate our own future destruction.  We have to deconstruct the state that protects them which has never been elected.  We need to open up the media to ensure our message gets fair play.  We need to reclaim our children from the schools that indoctrinate them at every level.  We must close our borders to the people who come here wanting to take.

We need those victories.  We need a Republican Party that has both the awareness and gumption to seek these battles.  I don’t think we have it right now, because they think money is enough.  And the right makes this mistake again and again, you can’t buy your way to victory in a war of ideals.  Stop fighting for equality, instead speak out for quality and do not be afraid to leave those behind who choose envy over opportunity.  We cannot simply hope people will choose wisely after seventy years of watching how they will otherwise be shepherded into the complete opposite.

Eventually, political reality will force the Republicans to realize this.  The National Right exists to make sure they do so before it is too late, and before there are so few Republicans remaining that we have only bad choices.

Posted on

The Insurgency

We live in occupied countries.  We know this intuitively because to speak our minds is to bring upon ourselves swift retribution, where our jobs, our reputation, and even our families may be taken from us.  People speculate as to who occupies us, identifying people, forces, and the means of our control, but it matters far less who controls us than how we effectuate our escape and the reclamation of our own destiny.

Without realizing it as such, we have begun an insurgency.  People worldwide are striking out in different ways against the governmental/banking/corporate/academic consensus whereby control is managed by a few, for their own benefit, and seeks actively to constrain those who have most agency from being able to disrupt their intentions.

Have you ever asked not just why white people, whose primary accomplishment was the construction of western civilization, but also married families, believers in the Christian God, and traditionalists who work the land are targeted?  These people are those who exercise free will, liberty, and moral judgment.  Our states can tolerate many things, but the one thing they cannot and will not abide are moral men, for they may put their own judgment above that of the state or its many appendages.

Consider for a moment how the worst degeneracy is not just tolerated, but promoted, encouraged, and tacitly allowed.  Laws are interpreted to the benefit of those who offer the least and used to persecute those with talent, ambition, and a sense of true justice.  Law itself has become a weapon to be used by a cynical guild and with the blessing of judges who think themselves gods unto themselves.  Activism rather than originalism.

The media cheers on the anarchist, goading them to go further in attacking the decent people, wanting them to stoke fear, and protecting them always from consequence because they are the disposable shock troops, a way to make use of our children whom we offer up for indoctrination to be used by those who control and despise us.  Should we resist, we are branded as villains, and even our own allies and friends forsake us under the withering pressure of a ubiquitous social network that stretches from work into the home studying all we do and commenting and correcting any heresy.

Against such odds, what can men do?  We can become insurgents.

We have begun our insurgency by throwing forward Orban, Brexit, Trump, Salvini, and others who speak reason in the face of insanity.  We assert up is up and down and down and reject the programming.  Every man and woman can take this first step, admitting their own logic and instincts to be true, and to see around them the multitude of falsehoods upon which our jails have been built.

The single most dangerous lie upon which this whole edifice depends is that all men are equal.  Reject this and admit the truth no two men are equal.  For no two men are the same.  No two people are the same.  No two ideas are the same.  No two cultures are the same.  And when one accepts this most basic truth:  That different ideas and people can be compared to one another, then we regain the ability to apply reason and morality to our lives once more.  Be not ashamed to assert that A is better than B, or that B is not C.  That is how we distinguish ourselves from the animals and call upon the gifts with which we were bestowed to comprehend our world.

Sane people realize men are not women.  They realize you cannot bring in people from Somalia and expect them to behave like Europeans.  They realize a religion built upon war like Islam is not a harbinger of peace.  Escape Room 101:  Pretend as you must but learn to hate Big Brother and share that message with all whom can think.  Be delighted as you learn, though our capacities vary, every man can understand the basic truth A is not B.  This is how the insurgency takes root.  Once you’ve learned to admit reason, to observe nature, and trust your instincts, there is no going back.

I cannot pretend it will be a happy discovery.  It will not.  Anger and frustration will rise in shared measure as you watch so many people parrot things you know to be manifestly false.  Worse still will be that you will likely do the same, to protect those close to you as you build your cocoons of sanity.  You may find yourself reorienting your life, moving away from the ambitions you once held to acquire stuff or gain status, and moving away from the sickness to which you have been forced to adhere to find health.  The quiet places of the world offer solace, and it is no accident those are targeted as well for seeding.

But those of us who are aware, who often cannot admit ourselves to one another for fear of reprisal, are fighting back and ideas are getting out there.  Social media moves more quickly than the ability of the machine to repress us, but we wander from larger platforms to smaller ones, requiring people to become nimbler to compete.  Even as our thoughts are as fast as the light that moves them, a time of choosing is coming.

We must build for this time.  I founded the National Right because there were truths I discovered, that I could prove and argue which I would not surrender, and to serve as a lamp-post in the darkness.  Others have built their own lights of different hues and brilliance, but each offers a chance to examine ideas we take for granted.  And should enough people cluster around these, perhaps we might yet bring light to everyone, unlike these elites whose illumination is reserved to a select corrupt few.

Those of us whose core ideas and inescapable identity are being targeted must come together for mutual preservation.  We must do so not just as who we are, but also in support of what we believe, for identity alone lacks the impetus to unite our squabbling folk, but the right vision could lift us up from bondage to this most cynical machine.  We must respect those who walk the path alongside us, recognizing those who beat the odds and embraced reason are our friends, and be unafraid to cast aside those who look like us and those who do not who refuse to do anything but service to the state which would consume us all.  We can mourn their loss, but we cannot allow ourselves to sink alongside those who have surrendered once established we cannot save them.

The struggle has already begun with education, awareness, and the awakening.  For a time, it will be political and cultural, where we must articulate our beliefs, gather our people, build our institutions, and do this all so carefully under the light of an all-seeing eye which seeks to burn itself into our still tender skin.  We must be calm, clever, and coordinated.

And then, we must fight like our lives depend upon this, for they surely do.  We have time enough to accomplish all this, but only just a little while, as every day we use is measured against the minds lost to the machine, the children we hand over to the dogma and indoctrination, and the steady cultural beat marching against us and turning we few who share these natural laws into pariahs and enemies.


The National Right will help spread the insurgency.  I share ideas.  Others will join.  We will build an organization.  We will hold events to make clear the issues, and write books to share facts, ideas, and thoughts.  We will run for offices when able, supporting those who help, and we will fight always for the core ideas:  Morality, responsibility, identity, and liberty.

Most importantly, we prepare ourselves for the fight of our lifetime.  For each of us, that battle will look different.  But each of us can win.  We win our own freedom first.  Sometimes, we win our families.  Those who are lucky might even win back a town.  But my hope and my prayer is we win back our civilization, for we are occupied, but I take hope that a single candle can shine all the more brilliant in the most oppressive darkness.

Posted on

Identity as a Moral Imperative – The Path Forward

Identity.  Ideology.  Ethnic Nationalism.  Civic Nationalism.  Spend any amount of time on a right wing forum where free speech is allowed, and it will not be long before you’re introduced to the great debate of our time, which is how can nationalism succeed?

There are civic nationalists who believe the only constrain upon national development is the willingness to adopt and share certain ideas.  In our American context, these include life, liberty, and property, respect for our national symbols like the flag, and generally trend toward tolerance with respect for tradition.  President Trump has governed in this fashion, creating opportunity for all Americans, and such thinking ranges from the Alt-Lite to mainstream conservatism.  The right likes this formulation because it allows them to maintain what has become the default position in the West that individuals make up our society, and our future extends outward strictly from those rights:  Libertarianism with a moral flavor.

Conversely, there are ethnic nationalists who make certain observations about the present and the future in assessing nationalism.  With respect for individuals, they also look at how different groups behave to see who support these ideals of life, liberty, and property.  They look at how white people of European extraction vote 60% and upwards for Republican, a de facto endorsement.  They also look how two-thirds of Latinos and Asians, as well as nine-tenths of blacks vote Democrat.  Such stark differences belie the possibility these variations are merely accidental.  Does the left effort to build a plantation mentality and support welfarism matter?  It must.  But it is also true these people emerge from more collectivist cultures, whose very inclination is hardwired in culture and potentially genetics to support socialism?  Looking at what sorts of governments exist in their native lands, the question is worth asking?

Nationalists want to see a stable and successful America built upon core values.  Few would take dispute with the ideas of morality, responsibility, and liberty.  But identity is harder, because the question of who belongs brings up a more fundamental inquiry.  Are we blank slates like Descartes suggested, where we use reason and act as individuals?  Or do we bring our cultural baggage with us, through genetics or through environment, most likely both, and are certain people therefore just less likely to sustain the core principles of western civilization under any circumstance?  The left calls this question racist and runs away shrieking, and the civic nationalists, from fear, refuse to ask.  But the question is valid.

To understand what nationalism can be in America, we must answer the question definitively of who will support our values.  We understand individuals who share these, of all races, can and do benefit.  And yet, as a contradiction, we also understand certain groups are far more likely than others to work for values based upon hard work and opportunity rather than just group advantage and opportunism.  We also reject this idea out of hand the left presents that the values upon which America were built were designed to inherently restrict minorities:  If that was the case, why are western nations and America specifically so willing to try to share our liberty and prosperity with minorities?  Such generosity disproves the false claim that prebuilt prejudice was behind the Constitutional values.

Debates about these topics rage for pages and hours, but I suggest our current political environment actually proves a more comprehensive test to advance this inquiry.  President Trump has worked tirelessly for the civic nationalist cause, creating opportunity for minorities that passes anything ever seen historically.  Unemployment rates are at all-time lows, the economy is prospering, and barriers to entry have been removed at every interval to success.  If minorities want to choose opportunity over welfarism and individualism over collectivism, there will never be a better test than 2020.  Let’s see, if given success, if they choose to endorse such action with their votes, or if they prefer instead to give control over to others as they have tended to vote for at least a half century.

If the minority voters shift toward Republicans in sizable numbers, which we’ll define here as 5% or more, then it would seem the civic nationalists might have something of a case.  But if they do not, and instead vote just as frequently or even more strongly for Democrats, then I think nationalists have to ask this question:  Having done everything possible to present our ideas of opportunity and responsibility with real world benefits to the minorities, and seeing them reject these out of hand, is it not imperative that to protect nationalism that we understand the ideals America was built upon will only exist with a white supermajority?

Should that supposition prove true, and such evidence as exists is compelling to the case, if the right is to preserve America as it has ever been, does it not have to inherently then work to advance the interests, numbers, and influence of the white majority?  I realize such a statement is profoundly uncomfortable for people who believe in individualism, and yet, paradoxically, if it is demonstrable only one group will support individualism as a preferred course of action, do not those who support individualism have to gather in strength with those of that same group to protect liberty?

Time will soon tell if the ethnic nationalists are right, but the more important question is does the right have the courage to act clearly in asking these questions, overcoming the intimidation the left uses to control them, and developing policy and politics to preserve the nation?  The National Right is leading this effort, despite overwhelming scrutiny, because truth matters.

Our moral imperative is to protect our nation, which evolves from those core ideas of morality, liberty, responsibility, and identity.  There will always be a place for those who choose an identity concordant with what America has always been who come from wherever and are legal citizens.  Remove that false canard that is used to repress reason.  But we may discover that America needs to be white to be free.

No majority-minority state in this union votes Republican.  And you see what the Democrats offer.  You must realize by now the reason they support open borders, loose immigration, and amnesty is because of the millions of voters they gain.  They won California.  They’re working on Texas.  And soon enough, should trends hold, they will have a strangle lock to favor socialism within a generation.

Whether you are an ethnic nationalist, civic nationalist, or just an American who believes in liberty, such an outcome should scare you.  It’s why we must answer the question now about how well we can integrate minorities  into the fold of traditional American ideas.  There’s something inherently fair about trying to do things the nice, moral, and just way.  Trump is our test and our olive branch to begin reuniting the nation.  But should his efforts ultimately be rebuffed, then unless we wish to surrender all the gains we worked to ensure he achieved, we must deal with reality as it is, and admit that liberty does not exist absent white identity.

I close only by saying supporting identity then becomes a moral act.  For if you offer learning and knowledge, as well as other support to someone who comes to you, and they rebuff your generosity instead wanting to simply take what you earned, is it not moral to stand up in common cause with those who are the builders and workers and say you cannot simply take indefinitely?  You would expel such people from your home for their theft and malfeasance, and we must be no less resolute.  This issue gets confused by racial appearances, but at heart, it is really a cultural issue, which is no nation may exist where whole groups CHOOSE to take more often than they give.

In addition to those minorities who do not contribute, those who push such folly within the majority, need to be opposed, confronted, and removed from impact just as forcefully.  The alternative is the loss of this nation and we cannot abide surrender to blackmail.  Because whether white or minority, America has no need for people who don’t want to contribute, and in such resolve, we might realize the cultural nationalism needed to further this just beginning restoration.  Identity matters because ideas matter, and the ideas we fight for are the ones which inspired our Founders and our entire civilization.

Posted on

Don’t Fool Yourself – The Left is Still Winning

Within the next month, I will be releasing my second book:  The Coming Civil War.  Over 384 pages, I lay out the contradictions at the heart of our republic that are driving the culture war as it burns from cold to hot, identify the major players, and assign which groups will gather to each side.  Six different scenarios are profiled therein, but to explain why such an event gains in likelihood each day, I write today to share with you the crisis.  In writing this book, I’ve come to realize just how dominant the Left has become, and my hope is after reading the below, you will also and will act with the urgency such understanding requires.

Since gaining control of the American education system, the forces of the Marxist Left have been following a recurring pattern of introducing reforms, weathering a period of conservative response, and then building upon the new cultural framework.  This generational approach to victory has been devastatingly effective and the bedrock upon how they have built their radically transformed country which we now inhabit today.

Consider the efforts by FDR to establish social welfare as an expectation for all Americans.  The very idea of socialism itself came under both national and international assault in the 40’s and seemed to fade away in the happy 50’s, but had become irrevocably part of our national expectation by the 60’s.

Consider the efforts by LBJ to realize the cultural revolution ideas of minority power, feminism, and war without sanction.  Resistance floated through the 70’s where a counter-revolution seemed to happen in the 80’s proved illusory by the 90’s.  All the social ethics of the 60’s were essentially adopted and accepted, leading today’s politically correct culture to rise.

Consider the efforts by Obama, which built upon the strong foundation left by LBJ as a multi-generational project, to remake the country by changing our demographics.  What the 1965 Hart-Celler Act began by opening America up to Third World immigration, chain migration, and a lottery system for who would be admitted, has been amplified through successive amnesties from Republicans and Democrats alike.  Obama’s open borders and refugee policies only made more blatant what the American government, in service to the Marxist Left, has been doing for a very long time which is seeding new people in the deliberate intent to outvote people who believe in traditional limited government, liberty, and national sovereignty.

Trump’s election was driven, in no small part, to reverse both these cultural trends and to stop the flow of immigration into America.  But as history shows, even a successful presidency has only served to slow the implementation of what the Left intends, leading to the acceptance of their basic action following the countervailing administration and a steady march leftward for the United States.  While embracing social welfare and the cultural revolution were bad enough, those could be undone with policy and determination.  The transformation of America, as we see happening already in Europe, through shifting demographics is end game for the Left.

Voting habits are indisputable.  White voters in America are the only group who vote Republican, with 58% having voted for Trump in the most recent election.  Compare this number to 65% of Asians, 66% of Latinos, and 89% of Blacks who voted for Hillary.  There is no election in American history since the 1960’s when the Democrats embraced racial politics full force where minorities have ever voted for Republicans at the national level, and these trends, correcting for a candidate like Obama who for obvious reasons of identity was able to get historically high support, are only accelerating.

At the same time minorities are more likely to vote Democrat, their numbers are growing.  According to current US Census estimates, America is now only 61% white.  Whites also have a declining birth rate as opposed to every other group who are becoming a larger share of the electorate.  Growth is most pronounced in Hispanics who have surged to become over 18% of the population, joining blacks at 13% and Asians at 6%.  Such figures only contemplate growth due to children being born, not accounting for the many legal and illegal immigrants, as well as refugees, who as added accelerate these trends.  Absent immigration, people who study these statistics estimate the tipping point is just one generation away in the 2040’s.

Given that more non-white children are being born today than white children, the radicalization of leftist ideology to legally enfranchise doctrines like white privilege which advocate for whites having fewer rights, it’s not hard to imagine what this future will look like absent some radical change.  Twenty to thirty years from now, a majority minority America will lean left, support socialism, and be closing in on nearly one hundred years of doctrine where successive generations will have been taught by schools at every level that the sole impediment to social justice in America has been white civilization, and the various ideas upon which it built America.  One need only look at the Marxist ideas coming from colleges and universities today as proof.

As the immigration and social policy of the Left realize the establishment of a permanent majority habituated to living off redistribution from the now white minority, the shrinking remnant will be targeted more deeply for economic sanction, political disenfranchisement, and social shaming.

We know this because there have been no other countries in history, besides the white countries of the West, who have ever voluntarily given away control over lands they possess.  In every other instance, which remains the case today in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, those of the dominant nationality conduct a logical foreign policy to ensure ethnic homogeneity for stability and mutual benefit.  In those instances where formerly white run colonial enterprises where any substantial number of settlers stayed behind, we see how the whites have been subject to exploitation, expropriation, and even genocide.

Zimbabwe is one example.  The country formerly known as Rhodesia, destroyed through international blockades, was delivered to tribal leadership who proceeded through several different organized murder schemes against farmers.  In fact, the situation became so bad these once fertile lands were no longer able to feed the existing African population, but as there were few whites left to help, the country slid into decay after rounds where this sad happenstance recurred.

South Africa, once a First World nation, has gone down the same pathway as a prosperous country was handed over to the Africa majority who had been motivated by many decades of communist ideology, beginning with Mandela whose legacy is whitewashed to appear a friendly leader, but whose party and policies were hard-line communist.  Now, we see a nation which has gone from food exportation to food importation, where cities run short on water, and brutal murders are increasingly common.  Recently, laws were passed in parliament whereby whites can have their lands taken without any recompense, adding to restrictions already in place whereby whites cannot get licensed for business, and are being restricted from emigration.

The violence committed against these people is pure savagery and barbarism.  Imagine children being drowned in bathtubs after being raped before their parents.  People are made to drink gasoline and then set on fire and rolled down the street stuffed in a tire as a warning.  Lest you think only Africans practice such heinous acts, ask a Vietnam veteran about their stories from Asia or check out how the Latino cartels handle not just their enemies, but regularly assassinate mayors whose version of justice impinges upon their business.  Violence is the reality of the world, and while we in the West have compartmentalized these actions, the rest of the world does not.

The West refuses to believes these examples, thinking their values of liberty, property, and the rule of law are universal.  In fact, these are unique cultural elements of white western culture, and while other people can enjoy them, especially when they are in the minority, they do not represent how the rest of the world organizes, and our assumption that our system will somehow magically convert people from different cultures to have these beliefs is not just short-sighted, but quite probably suicidal.  That we continue to believe this will happen, whether in our interventions abroad or more dangerously, as we bring people into our host nation as we are in America, against all evidence, is an absurdity that drives the current crisis.

Because of our own unique cultural beliefs in individualism influenced by Christian universalism, the Right has allowed the Left to import whomever they wanted for many decades under the assumption our system would lift these people to our level.  While they have indubitably gained economically, if we honestly assess culture and politics, have we not seen the Left realize the opposite?  In culture, we have gone from a single ideal based on virtue and hard work to a proliferation of ideas all opposed to one another, leading to rises in drugs, violence, breakdown of the family, and other social ills.  In response to this as well as based on Marxist doctrine itself, government has become larger, more expansive, more powerful, and less accountable.  An honest assessment would be the price of America becoming more diverse is we have become not just less united, but also more like every other country.

As more Americans awaken to this startling reality, we face a choice.  Should we choose not to act, America will walk the path of South Africa.  Such declination may be gradual over thirty years or as abrupt as ten years, but without wholesale policy and immigration changes, these will come.  Those who lean Right, who are overwhelmingly from the white majority, will need to embrace race realism to survive, and furthermore, will need to act upon their interest.

Although the civil nationalism espoused by Trump has much to commend it, with immigration policies based on merit, an end to the visa lottery, and an end to chain migration as a good start, such actions only ensure the coming demographic collapse approaches at a more moderate pace.  Even a hard moratorium on immigration on a race-blind basis, more than either party has the courage to commit to publicly, will not reverse the trend whereby the future is populated by a majority who lean heavily to the Left.

The presumption civic nationalists offer is the economic prosperity currently being generated will be sufficient to transform minority voting patterns.  Although there are certainly individual examples of conversion, there is zero evidence to suggest these trends are being realized in anything close to resembling mass adoption as needed.  The historical pattern is times of prosperity tend to heighten alienation between the white majority and minorities as the Democrats tend to use such times to highlight cultural messages based on resentment and envy when unable to use economics as their primary focus.  We see this happening today in the public radicalism and extremism.

Since the Right does not control culture or media, it has limited efficacy in countering this narrative.  To succeed, civic nationalism would require its own ability to broadcast culture at a mass level, and while gains have been made in creating a counter-culture, what Trump’s election ha s facilitated is a system wide crackdown on rightward dissent at the global level.  While traditional media and academia steadily beat out the communist line, the Internet itself is being increasingly regulated, with comments being hidden, voices being marginalized, and even speech being criminalized in some places, always to the Right.  For those who persist, they lose their jobs, their friends, and occasionally, their lives.  To this point, the civic nationalists have done nothing about this, other than to bemoan unequal treatment.

Were civic nationalism to succeed, it would have to convert minorities to a well-articulated culture and use the legal authority which it should have in America at least, through control of all three nominal branches of government, to restrict and remove the Left’s dominance in culture.  The Republicans are not doing this and will not do this for fear of being called racist and the criticism the media would therein generate.  But, even presuming they could, the Left took nearly one hundred years to gain their dominance in culture, and the Right, working through voluntary means, would take about half that in a best-case scenario to reach parity.  As demographics show, that’s about seventy years too late to matter.

All these facts considered, the civic nationalism of Trump will fail in preventing victory by the Left in the cultural civil war now starting unless it does one of two things and perhaps both.  It must either find a way to permanently realize power for the Right and remake the cultural apparatus of education and media to no longer actively promote communist ideals and minority radicalization, which could only be undertaken under martial law scenarios.  Or, conversely, it could act decisively to try to change the population mix, increasing the white population and radicalization through immigration, family planning, and selective migration.  It’s very possible, to preserve the culture and identity upon which liberty depends and has only ever existed, both will be necessary.  It’s also almost certainly the case such policies could never be successfully enacted through the conventional political process, and either would quite possibly lead to insurrection by the Left.

The refusal to act leads to a victory for the Left by default.  While the current situation of the Right controlling government presents the appearance that the Left is in greater peril, even eight years of Trump will do little more to stop the march leftward of America than eight years of Eisenhower did in slowing welfare or Reagan in stopping cultural Marxism.  The only difference is should the Trump years prove a respite instead of a revolution, our future will be one where our destines are not our own to decide.

If we wait until then to act, we will be forced to fight a battle against a hostile government, a socialist or communist majority, and with innumerable technological and surveillance challenges.  Furthermore, we will have consigned yet another generation to the very education system that loves to teach these Marxist ideals, even more radicalized than the street violence we see from groups like antifa today.  Our odds in such a fight would be considerably worse than they are today where we still have parity numerically and the considerable advantage, at least temporarily, of a government not diametrically opposed to the people and their liberties.

If the Left was smart, they would just keep quiet through the reign of Trump, as older more shrewd hands with the Democrats advocate.  They know they are on the verge of ultimate victory in remaking America as well as the West.  Yet, their fatal flaw is the people they have so agitated against the majority are hungry for power, and in their taste for control, reveal their true nature in how violently they stalk the streets and how they show no care for the rule of law, but only that of the jungle.  They would take power if we give them the opportunity.

How we face this challenge and articulate our own ideals, wanting to preserve our liberty, needing to defend our people, but seeking to retain our morality in the most responsible manner is our crisis.  For we, we civilized few, cannot simply engage in a battle where we hold ourselves to a higher standard.  But I venture this:  Even if we cannot simply make this us versus them, which I understand would undo too much good work done to awaken people to the light of reason and the comforts of faith, can we not at least hold accountable those who refuse to awaken?

If we do not, we have already surrendered.  I love my nation too much for that, and in asking these hard questions, the National Right will seek to find this path to preserve our liberties.  I have no illusions this will be an easy road and will state very publicly that fighting seems far preferable to me than surrender.  A movement with no future is one which cannot win, and our challenge together is how we make sure the best ideas of our past find new meaning as we step into this most uncertain future?

When we answer that question, we will be ready to stand in opposition to the Left.  Until then, for all we have accomplished, we have not yet truly begun to fight.